The story of the Govan collection has been told in detail in the expanded
proceeding of the 1992 conference, published under the title Govan and its
Early Mediaeval Sculpture. The Govan Sarcophagus was brought into the
extended chancel of the church in 1908. In 1926 five hogbacks, three cross
shafts and sixteen cross slabs were brought inside. The shaft of the Govan
cross ( for about 100 years placed outside Jordanhill House ) was returned
in 1928. In April of this year, Hunter & Clark added 4 conserved stones
to the 26 monuments on permanent display within the church by fixing two in
the Transept and two in the Baptistry, where Stirling Maxwell number
12 and the Cuddy Stone ( Stirling Maxwell no. 9 ) were repositioned.
Plate 1 shows eights pieces of stones being removed from the churchyard under
the direction of Dr. Colleen Batey of the Kelvingrove Museum. The diagram
( plate 2 ) shows the four stones to be re-assembled from the seven stone
pieces collected from Govan Old Parish Church during October 1993. Plates
3-6 show the conserved stones, ready to be returned to Govan. Individual
stones are identified by the number given for them in Sculptured Stones
in the Kirkyard of Govan by Sir John Stirling Maxwell. The rest of this note
is reproduced with kind permission from the final report produced by Historic
Scotland on their work at the Conservation Centre, South Gyle, Edinburgh.
No. 31 ( frag. 4 ) Approximately 80% of the carved detail has
been lost leaving a 500mm x 150mm area of interlaced carving. The
surface of the stone was covered by mud. Removal of the mud revealed
drips and splashes of paint. Paint covers almost 10% of the carved
surface of the stone. Also, 2 prominent gauge marks, one approx.
100mm x 10m, the second, 90mm x 10mm at right angles to the first
appears across the carved surface of the stone. A black sulphation
deposit covering over 90% of the stone surface was exposed upon
the removal of the mud.
|Plates 1c/1d: APRIL 1992: Removing Stirling Maxwell numbers 21, the top half of 23, 31, 36 and placing them in the narthex of the church before conservation. Number 42 was placed under the large tree close to the small side entrance door
No. 21, in 3 pieces ( frags 2, 6 and 7 ) Frag. 2 suffers from
areas of surface delamination where the rebate has been dressed
around the edge of the stone leaving an exposed body of stone
upon the face. All 3 frags have lost a great deal of carved
detail. Frag. 6, however, details a carved surface in the form
of a 6-cord plait which remains relatively well defined. The
broken edges of the frags where the stones butt together are fresh
suggesting that the stone breakages are relatively recent. The frags
realign well thereby making for a less complicated rejoining process.
No. 23 ( frag. 5 ) appears not to have suffered the same weathering
process as have the other stones. The soil moulding and faint traces
of pattern survive. Diagonal striations appear across the stone
surface. This may be due to soft materials within the bedding planes
of the stone. The stone is affected to a lesser extent by a black
sulphation deposit. A non-contemporary script has been carved into
the stone towards the bottom edge. The bottom edge appears to have
been sawn rather than broken.
No. 36, in 2 pieces ( frags 1 and 3 ). Both frags 1 and 3 suffer
from an advanced loss of surface detail. A non-original script, 'WR',
has been carved upside down upon the surface of the stone. The edges
where the two stones butt together is relatively fresh therefore making
the rejoining process less complicated. Areas of black sulphation
deposits exist in places as do tool marks suggesting that
attempts have previously been made to remove such deposits.
No. 31 ( frag. 4 ). The stone was sufficiently protected and
transported to our Edinburgh studio. The stone was recorded
photographically and its condition was noted. An investigate clean
was undertaken to assess the condition of the stone and to select
the most appropriate cleaning method. Loose mud which existed to
a depth of 5mm in some places was removed using a soft brush
and vacuum cleaner. This trial clean was undertaken on a
representative area of the stone which, when cleaned, was seen to
be in sound condition. Having been assured of the durability of
the stone, the mud was washed off using 25 psi water pressure and
nylon bristled brush. Having exposed the paint beneath the mud
layer, trials were conducted to determine the most effective
method of paint removal.
Trials areas were selected. A Sodium Hydroxide poultice was applied
to one small area and a layer of water soluble Dichloromethane was
applied to another. The latter proved most successfull and the
paint was removed by this method. The Dichloromethane solvent and
dissolved paint layer were then washed off. The conserved stone was
photographed and prepared for its return to Govan.
|Plate 5: No. 31 ( frag 4 )
No. 21, in 3 pieces ( frags 2, 6 and 7 ). The frags were
transported to the studio and recorded. The surface mud was washed
off using 25 psi water pressure. The delamination fissures were
consolidated by flooding an acrylic resin in solution into the cracks.
The frags were rejoined with four, 400mm lengths of 16mm Austinitic
Stainless Steel dowel (BS316) and an epoxy resin. Once rejoined, an
acrylic resin and stone dust repair material was used to partially
fill the joint between the two halves. The repair material was
specifically designed, in terms of colour, hardness and texture, to
create a material which was sympathetic to the stone itself. The
repair material is removable. The stone was recorded in its repaired
state and prepared for its return to Govan.
No. 23 ( frag. 5 ) The stone was protected for transportation,
recorded photographically in the studio and cleaned using 25 psi
water pressure and a nylon brush. The cleaned stone was recorded
photographically and prepared for its return to Govan.
|Plates 3/4: No. 21 ( frags 2, 6, 7 ) / Top half of No. 23 ( frag 5 )
No. 36, in 2 pieces ( frags 1 and 3 ). These stones were protected
and transported to our studio, and photographed there. The stones
were cleaned using 25 psi water pressure and a nylon brush. The
fragments were rejoined using 2, 400mm lengths of 16mm Austinitic
Stainless Steel (BS316) and an epoxy resin. The resultant crack in
the surface of the stone where the 2 halves joined was partially
filled with an acrylic resin and stone dust material which was
saturated sufficiently to create a cosmetically sympathetic repair.
The stone was photographed and made ready for its return to Govan.
|Plate 6: No. 36 ( frags 1, 3 )
The 4 individual stones were returned to Govan Old Parish Church on
8/9 February 1994.